Rendered at 22:52:55 04/19/25
Seller discounts available! Show Hide
Save 5% on orders over £75.59 from this seller
Get free shipping on orders over £75.59 from this seller
Full-size item image
Primary image for Sebastian Trucco Divinyls Lip Gloss in Firecracker
Free Shipping

Sebastian Trucco Divinyls Lip Gloss in Firecracker

£6.42 GBP
Ships from United States Us

Shipping options

Estimated to arrive by Tue, May 13th. Details
Calculated by USPS in GB.
Ships from United States Us

Return policy

Refunds available: See booth/item description for details Details

Purchase protection

Payment options

PayPal accepted
PayPal Credit accepted
Venmo accepted
PayPal, MasterCard, Visa, Discover, and American Express accepted
Maestro accepted
Amazon Pay accepted
Nuvei accepted

Shipping options

Estimated to arrive by Tue, May 13th. Details
Calculated by USPS in GB.
Ships from United States Us

Return policy

Refunds available: See booth/item description for details Details

Purchase protection

Payment options

PayPal accepted
PayPal Credit accepted
Venmo accepted
PayPal, MasterCard, Visa, Discover, and American Express accepted
Maestro accepted
Amazon Pay accepted
Nuvei accepted

Item traits

Category:

Lip Gloss

Quantity Available:

10 in stock

Condition:

New

UPC:

769295700186

Brand:

Sebastian Trucco

Size:

Full Size

Type:

Single

Color:

Firecracker

Listing details

Seller policies:

View seller policies

Shipping discount:

Seller pays shipping for this item.

Price discount:

5% off w/ $100.00 spent

Posted for sale:

More than a week ago

Item number:

483274563

Item description

These lip gloss colours make modern sensuality sexy. Delicious colours that stay true from the gloss wand to the lips. Shiny, transparent, sexy colour in a variety of knockout shades. Apply to bare lips for a sensual look, or over lipstick for more impact. Color is Firecracker, a true red. This is a full size 3.8 g/.135 oz tube. New in Box. VERY LIMITED NUMBER IN STOCK! LIMITED TIME ONLY SPECIAL PRICE! COPYRIGHT NOTICE: ALL IMAGES AND TEXT IS OURS! Under Fair Use, trademark and copyrighted allows a seller to use the name and a picture of the item they were selling. For example: If you are selling a Lancome or Dior Mascara you can say “This is a Lancome or Dior mascara” without infringing on the trademark. International law is consistent on these issues. All descriptions and pictures are taken with my camera and written up on my computer. The Lanham Act also specifically recognizes the “fair use” of a company’s trademark. The Fair Use Doctrine grants the use of a trademark under certain conditions. Copyright laws: Copyright law, like trademark law, grants a lot of exclusive rights to the holder of the copyright. It also states specific exceptions. The First Sale Doctrine is an important part of trademark law. Without it, owning something would be VERY complicated. The First Sale Doctrine says that once the owner of a copyrighted item sells it, or gives it away, the owner can no longer control what is done with the item. If that were not the case, you could not repaint your car, have a garage sale to get rid of junk, or donate that old computer to the charity. The First Sale Doctrine prevents the copyright owner from interfering with your use, alteration, and subsequent disposal of something you bought or received as a present. Suppose you purchased a coloring book manufactured by Disney and your child colored a picture making the Lion King purple. Should Disney have the right to have you arrested because your child didn’t use the correct colors? No. They lost control of that coloring book when you bought it. In short, fair use permits others to use a protected mark to describe aspects of their own goods, provided the use is in good faith and not as a mark. See 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b)(4) . That is precisely the case here. The “offending” use described is merely fair use to describe the product(s) offered for sale. The fair use doctrine permits use of a protected mark by others to describe certain aspects of the user’s own goods. See CarFreshner Corp. v. S.C. Johnson Son, Inc. , 70 F.3d 267, 270 (2d Cir. 1995).